Democracy

Power and decision-making in the United States

The Global Teach In - April 25, 2012

Austria: Vienna - Canada: Kelowna, British Columbia; Toronto, Ontario - South Africa: Durban - Sweden: Stockholm; United Kingdom - Birmingham, England; Edinburgh, Scotland; London, England - United States Ann Arbor, Michigan; Annandale-on-Hudson, New York; Boston, Massachusetts; Burlington, Vermont; Chicago, Illinois; Madison, Wisconsin; New York, New York; Olympia, Washington; Portland, Oregon; San Francisco, California; Washington, DC - Venezuela: Caracas

Boston events

10:00 - 10:30 a.m. Bill McKibben (Boston University, College of Arts & Sciences, Room B27)

12 noon - 4:00 p.m. Global Teach-In (Screening & Local Conversation - encuentro 5, 33 Harrison Ave, 5th floor, Boston, MA 02111)

Global Teach In

CANADA Kelowna, British Columbia Toronto, Ontario SOUTH AFRICA Durban SWEDEN Stockholm UNITED KINGDOM Birmingham, England Edinburgh, Scotland London, England UNITED STATES Ann Arbor, Michigan Annandale-on-Hudson, New York Boston, Massachusetts Boulder, Colorado Chicago, Illinois Burlington, Vermont Los Angeles, California Olympia, Washington Madison, Wisconsin New York, New York Portland, Oregon San Francisco, California Washington, DC

The Global Teach-In will take place simultaneously in a number of cities, starting on April 25th, 2012 at 12:00 Noon Eastern Standard Time. This interactive and participatory event will include discussions by experts, grassroots activists and citizens at large concerned about developing solutions to policy problems and creating alternative institutions. The Teach-In will involve face-to-face deliberation, teleconferencing and an internet-based broadcasting network. Local teach-in groups already exist or are in formation. Participate by organizing a teach-in, joining a local group or listening to the broadcast

#Occupy Global Teach-in

The Majority Agenda Project is a sponsor the Global Teach-In. The local event will take place at ...

Schedule: Wisconsin Wave Tours Massachusetts

 

Date
Time
Institution
Host/Location
Sun, Oct 30
6:00 p.m.
Boston College
Appalachia Volunteers of Boston College
Mon, Oct 31
10:00 a.m.
UMass Lowell
 
 
12:30 p.m.
UNITE-HERE
New England Joint Board, 33 Harrison Ave, 8th floor, Boston, MA 02111
 

Wisconsin Wave- Speaker Biographies

Ben Manski: He was the initiator of the Wisconsin Wave, a broad coalition that has played a leading role in the Wisconsin uprising, and is also the executive director of the Liberty Tree Foundation, an associate fellow with the Institute for Policy Studies, and a co-founder of the Move to Amend coalition. Politically engaged since his early childhood in Israel and Wisconsin, now in his mid-30s, Ben Manski has worked for a variety of causes, notably serving as co-chair of the Green Party of the United States. Manski was a primary figure in the student movements of the 1990s, serving then as national coordinator of the Democracy Teach-Ins in the lead-up to the Seattle WTO protests. Today is a public interest lawyer, teaches sociology at Madison College, and remains a committed pro-democracy advocate.

 

Explaining Obama

The most recent "compromise" negotiated by President Obama has deepened the conversation about his tendency to compromise when the American people, and the rest of the world, expect real leadership. In the next few weeks we'll carry a number of different approaches to the President by cherry-picking from the web. In the present piece, political psychologist Drew Westen reconnects us with those heady days that followed the election in 2008 and shows us how the capable story-teller President failed to offer a counter narrative that "bends the arc of history toward justice." 

First they attacked union bargaining rights in Wisconsin ...

... and I did not speak out, since I am a peace activist in Massachusetts. But last week the MA House overwhelmingly  "voted to strip police officers, teachers, and other municipal employees of most of their rights to bargain over health care."

See: www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2011/04/27/house_votes_to_limit_bargaining_on_health_care/

Unlike the Tea Party efforts to eliminate union bargaining rights for public employees in Ohio, Wisconsin, and other states, this move in MA was led by Democrats who have traditionally stood with unions to oppose any reduction in workers’ rights.
 ...
“It’s pretty stunning,’’ said Robert J. Haynes, president of the MA AFL-CIO. “These are the same Democrats that all these labor unions elected. The same Democrats who we contributed to, in their campaigns."

Fifty-nine percent: Tax the Rich!

Two recent polls by Gallup affirm support for the idea that the rich must pay their fair share. On April 11, 2011, 59% of the respondents indicated that next year's budget should include "higher taxes on for families with household income higher than $250,000 and above." Another Gallup survey (on April 14, 2011) with somewhat different wording found a statistical tie in response to the question, "Do you think our government should or should not redistribute wealth by heavy taxes on the rich? The results should 47% choosing "should" and 49% opting for "should not" (with a 4 percent margin of error). Given the loaded wording, it is a remarkable percentage in favor of heavy taxation. Nearly 60% also indicated their preference that "money and wealth should be more evenly distributed" among Americans.

Runciman: The Offshore Elites

Today states and nation states compete with one another for investment and the resulting jobs. In the end, politicians of whatever stripe are more accountable to investors and less to voters. This situation is often presented as a natural outcome of globalization and economic development. In a review of two recent books, David Runciman, a well-known British political scientist, shows that seemingly unrelated developments: the resurrection of London as a center of global finance, the stationing of corporations in Delaware, the rise of sovereign wealth funds, and even Saif al-Islam Ghadaffi's philanthropy, are all connected with the relentless pressures of pro-business lobbyists and less with elections.

Syndicate content